Eligibility Update: Swensson vs. Soetoro Filed
August 21st, 2009
I just received the email from Phil regarding the Swensson vs. Soetoro Petition. If you have a chance you should visit the The-Right-Side-Of-Life website for more details. I am delighted to see the Grand Jury concept being pushed in this Petition. I don’t agree that a Petition has any more standing than our Grand Jury Presentments — it really is a useless argument. Standing is standing.
In the past few weeks I was disturbed to hear some of Carl’s people suggesting our Presentments didn’t have standing or the American Grand Jury process was going about its business in the wrong way. That type of dialogue doesn’t sit well with me. The truth is that Mack Ellis and American Grand Jury paved the way for this Petition that Carl is now dedicated to. Our Super Grand Jury Presentments pried opened some doors in Washington and these AGJ Presentments continue to this day to rufflle feathers and expose Obama for who he really is.
The District Court in Washington DC sooner or later will rule on our “Motion to Reconsider.” I believe we made a very strong argument before Judge Lamberth suggesting his order denying our Presentments comes dangerously close to judicial mispresentation. Yet, another door is opened for others to follow.
Honestly, we don’t care who gets the Judiciary to wake up — American Grand Jury has done its part by educating the people to the Constitutional power of the Grand Jury. We have served almost 300 Courts, Judges, DA’s, Politicians and Legislators across the land. As a result of our efforts the Judiciary is well aware of the eligibility and treason issues surrounding Obama. We have pushed these Judges and Courts hard and they know exactly who we are. Nobody can take that away from us.
Personally, I hope Judge Lamberth warms up to the idea of convening a Federal Grand Jury. This Judge is in a bind if he rejects our “Motion to Reconsider” because it then opens the door for an Appeal or possibly a Supreme Court hearing based on Constitutional issues. If he decides to convene a Federal Grand Jury he will in effect do exactly what we asked of the Court all along, to prosecute Obama. I pray the man is not afraid to allow justice to prevail in his courtroom. There is definitely a credibility issue if the Court fails to act on the Presentments or the Petition.
If any of you would like to download the American Grand Jury Presentments and serve them in your local jurisdiction you can do so. Click the link here and read our information page. There is a link at the bottom of this page to request the Presentments.
Here is what the front page of the American Grand Jury “Motion to Reconsider” looks like:
You can read the Motion in its entirety here:
Stay tuned! American Grand Jury and our members don’t know how to quit. Our mission is and always will be to get rid of Obama. He is a Usurper and extremely dangerous to the health and welfare of our Nation.
Blessings,
Bob Campbell
American Grand Jury
August 21st, 2009 at 8:03 am
Bob,
Please re-point your links to unauthenticated pages.
They seem to be pulling up password-protected areas on your site.
Thanks for the hat tip.
Best,
-Phil
August 21st, 2009 at 9:01 am
It’s a shame they included an incorrect charge that John McCain was not a natural born US citizen in their pleadings. John McCain was in fact born at the Coco Solo Naval Air Station Hospital inside the 10 mile wide Panama Canal Zone in 1936, which was sovereign US Territory at the time. John McCain’s Father, a US Naval Officer, was a natural born US citizen as was John McCain’s Mother. John McCain’s eligibility is not at issue here, Barack Obama’s is. It is a separate issue and has no bearing on Obama’s eligibility. They are flat wrong and they have hurt their credibility by including McCain’s eligibility as an issue.
I was stationed in the Republic of Panama from 1986 to 1989 and was the US Air Force’s Plans Officer to USSOUTHCOM. I had a copy of the Panama Canal Treaty in my office safe and I was intimately familiar with it’s contents.
August 21st, 2009 at 10:06 am
Mac,
Can you send me the Petition by email. I am unable to download the Petition on their website.. times out every time I try and get there.
If they indeed charged McCain as not being a “natural born citizen” that is a questionable charge. Well, I shouldn’t say more as it is not my place to pass judgement.
Thanks for the update on this.
Bob
August 21st, 2009 at 3:11 pm
Hey guys long time no see.
Lets get something straight here.
The petition filed by Patriots Heart Network with Carl, Robert DeBeaux, Robert Pinkstaff, and Penny would have been possible even without the AJG presentment and motion to reconsider.
Let me state emphatically, that AGJ was the first, and as a result of that presentment and the ruling, the PHN “criminal” filing addresses the exact fallacies that Judge Lamberth says the AGJ presentments lack.
As AGJ correctly stated they are first. As AGJ stated they paved the way. AGJ is the pioneer of this court effort and correctly stated the ruling by Judge Lamberth opens the door more than shuts the issue out.
I have read the motion to reconsider in its entirety. It is (in my opinion) eloquently written. I however do admit it does not appeal to the legal issues but to the moral ones. Both set of issues exists. Remeber, the ruling was filed by the court under “Misc”.
The PHN case “is” filed under a criminal case number. It addresses these issues concerning the ruling Lamberth made:
The court did not appoint the jurors for the Grand Jury; This case demands it of him
The court dismisses the presentment, let it be an indictment by a Judge or a prosecutor
The court dismisses a fair cross section; the DC juries pool addresses that issue. (We are sincere in our hope that we can get a fair pulling of non obot sympathizers)
The court dismisses the issue because it was not jurisdictional, this case addresses that.
So, if you consider that Judge Lamberth gave us a blueprint on how to properly file this case, then you can conclude the next logical step after the presentment and the motion to reconsider is nothing other than:
A properly submitted criminal case. Voila. Citizens do it again. (note the plural at the end of the citizens) this is a victory for everyone. Not PHN, not AGJ, Not Carl, not me, every american…
It has taken a long time to get to where we are now.
What if we had waited on the results of Carls Common Law presentment results? What if we had waited on the AGJ first Grand Jury presentment results? How about Orly Taitz court cases? How about Leo Donofrio’s cases?
We are modifying our tactics just like the opposition. Building on our successes and correcting our errors.
I want to congratulate everyone who is in this battle for our freedom.
From the bottom of my heart thank you for your efforts
.
August 21st, 2009 at 11:31 pm
You all have to watch these video:
Sean Hannity - Obama & Friends History of Radicalisam
http://contributors.blogsome.com/2009/08/21/sean-hannity-obama-friends-history-of-radicalisam/
The 6 Video segments below Were Supposed to have Aired on SEAN HANNITY’s Show on Fox on 8/9/09 — before it was removed by Obama’s henchmen.
August 21st, 2009 at 11:58 pm
I do not know how or even why Obama’s henchmen could have removed the airing of this show. Well, maybe the why they would is to keep the public from seeing it AGAIN! I say again, because Hannity aired that show before the election on Hannity’s America. It aired several times because I watched it.
It was also well adverised before being aired to inform people to tune in and watch it. So if they couldn’t have stopped then, how were they able to stop it from being replayed again now?
August 22nd, 2009 at 1:12 am
Hannity for President?? Is this true - did anyone hear this discussion on talk radio today?
August 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am
U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-mc-00442-RCL
Update on PACER..
PATRIOT’S HEART MEDIA NETWORK, INC. et al v. SOETORO et al
Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Date Filed: 08/19/2009
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Date Filed # Docket Text
08/20/2009 1 PETITION FOR THE CONVENING OF A FEDERAL GRAND JURY by PATRIOT’S HEART MEDIA NETWORK, INC., CARL SWENSSON, ROBERT DEBEAUX, ROBERT D. PINKSTAFF, PENNY KELSO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit s 1-15, # 2 Exhibit s 16-22, # 3 Exhibit s 23-27)(kb) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
Notice Judge Lamberth has once again “filed” this “petition” as a “Miscellaneous Case,” just as he did with the super grand jury presentment.
August 22nd, 2009 at 11:30 am
The fact that they included McCain simply shows how far off base these people have become. Why would anyone include something as irrelevant as the question about McCain? Are we so delusional and sidetracked that we have to continue bringing up McCain, which is clearly a non-issue at this point? Why confuse the issue? I think this fact speaks volumes about how effective these misguided people actually are and will be. This is my opinion, and I stand ready to defend and argue this position with anyone that has the intelligence to accurately speak about this issue.
August 22nd, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Mack, it may be that they are attempting to prove that the entire election was a farce. There may be a method in their madness. I have my doubts about McCains eligibility although it is more of a technicality than a blatant attempt to defraud, as in Obama’s case.
August 23rd, 2009 at 11:40 am
Mack Ellis,
The Framers had to insert a grandfather clause in Article II, Section I, Clause 5, because they had dual citizenship at birth thru Great Britain. It is clear that they did not want dual citizenship at birth for POTUS because of divided loyalties.
Clearly McCain was a Natural Born Citizen. Both of his parents were U.S. citizens and Mc Cain was born in the Panama Canal because his father was on a military duty issue in that region at that time.
Why do these people keep bringing McCain eligibility?
Well, most of the attorneys on this case are liberal leftists. Most of them are Hillary’s fans. And most of them are Bush/basher, anti-war on terrorism, thruters and anti-conservative republicans.
The problem with the Obama eligibility is that it was first picked up by the leftists who wanted to discredit him so Hillary would be the candidate.
This is what I hate from the republican conservatives in USA. They don’t fight back. They want to be the “good guys” and so they lose. They should have been the first ones on the Obama eligibility issue. But no, they left it to the left fringe.
Take McCain for instance, he knew Obama was not eligible… did he fight this? NO. Does any of the conservative republicans in Congress and Senate raise this issue? NO. Only Dr Alan Keyes had the courage to raise this issue.
Conservative republicans will have to learn how to fight, otherwise this country is doomed.
August 23rd, 2009 at 7:29 pm
I have seen the scanned original of John McCain’s birth certificate, and it says “Republic of Panama” at the top. Some of my research based on others’ research is that the Coco-Sola (sp?) military base had not been constructed in 1936, the year of McCain’s birth. Therefore, he was born at a hospital in Colon, Panama. Perhaps I’m wrong.
The point is that neither candidate from either of the two major parties was without questions regarding constitutional eligibility. The most significant point is that the Senate appears to have “vetted” McCain in April 2008 by asking for his original birth certificate and having several constitutional lawyers examine the situation, while they did nothing about Obama’s past. They unanimously passed Senate Resolution #511, which “stated” that McCain was a “natural born citizen,” indicating that they were aware that a question might arise and needed to be addressed. Why, then did they not do the same for Obama? And isn’t it creepy that Obama and Hillary Clinton were co-sponsors of the resolution?
The resolution is non-binding but probably did attempt to make an end-run around the Constitution, just as Obama has. Clearly, no one held Obama to the same standard as McCain. The resolution states that BOTH McCain’s parents were U.S. citizens, but Obama’s were not. That was a blatant case of favoritism for Obama.
The result is the biggest election fraud in our nation’s history. Whether or not McCain was technically eligible may not ever be decided conclusively, but Obama’s has to be, because he supposedly won and now refuses to release any documentation. Of course, it should have been released BEFORE the election to avoid all of this.
Also, Chalice said on the the radio last night that the PHN case has been filed as a civil case.
August 23rd, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Regarding some of the posts above, who is “they” as it relates to McCain’s eligibility? Who keeps bringing that up?
August 24th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Capt. Mac,
I am not confident of who you are referring pertaining your statement of John McCain as an incorrect charge? Are you quoting the Senate Resolution 511 regarding Presidential candidate John McCain’s natural born citizenship? If so, this resolution is nonbinding and has absolutely no legal effect. Congress does not, nor has it ever held the power to interpret the Constitution of the United States; this power is resolved only at the Supreme Court of the United States, reason it is non-binding.