D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility
January 29th, 2010
Contends president’s allegiance is to Britain, Kenya, Indonesia
A prominent attorney who has shepherded a number of high-profile legal cases challenging Barack Obama’seligibility to be president has brought a “Quo Warranto” case to district court in Washington, D.C., alleging his allegiances have included Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.
A Quo Warranto action, first recorded some 800 years ago, essentially is a demand to know by what authority a public figure is acting. The case, brought by California attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of herself, was assigned to Chief Judge Royce Lamberth.
Taitz told WND that in a separate action she has filed a notice of appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of the dismissal of a case she brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and dozens of other individuals in California challenging Obama’s eligibility.
She previously attempted Quo Warranto cases on behalf of government officials, without response. This time she filed the action directly with the court on her own behalf.
“The case revolves around the federal question of eligibility of the president under Quo Warranto,” she wrote.
An online constitutional resource says Quo Warranto “affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.”
John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, an organization founded by former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, previously told WND the demand was a legitimate course of action.
“She basically is asking, ‘By what authority’ is Obama president,” he told WND when the issue first arose. “In other words, ‘I want you to tell me by what authority. I don’t really think you should hold the office.’”
Eidsmoe said it’s clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that “he does not want the public to know.”
According to the online Constitution.org resource: “The common law writ of Quo Warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.”
Taitz’ claim states Obama, whom she identifies as “Acting President of the United States,” has refused “to present in any court of law or to the public any vital records that would show his eligibility as for U.S. presidency based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution, as one born in the United States to two citizen parents without allegiance to any other sovereignties. From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.”
January 29th, 2010 at 11:31 pm
I hope this judge is more inclined to help and figure out just who this person is or maybe he will be one who says “we don’t want to overturn a presidential election for a simple court case” That, in my humble opinion would be tragic. Political Correctness was subject of report by Hal Lindsey of TBN tonight, he was very accurate and mentioned how it is ruining this country, that every comment anybody makes is based on this subject. As I voted for McCain, ot because of color but because I thought and now I know he had more character that the idiot, fool that won, but time is telling me I made a better choice. God Bless All, America mostly
January 30th, 2010 at 12:28 am
I know Goldie I’m really worried that no one will have the nerve (can’t say what I want to here) to question the “furor” or his reason for Sealing ALL his records. Did you know that his FIRST day in office he created an Executive Order to Seal all Presidential records?? Well it’s true. I googled Executive Orders and there is an online website (government site) that lists them. I typed in 2009 in the search and BOOM there it is…the very first one dated Jan. 21, 2009! That proves more than anything to me that he has ALOT to hide and is doing so any way possible!
January 30th, 2010 at 2:51 am
What ever happened to the article that was posted here yesterday on the Chrismas bomber?
I hope it wasn’t taken off because of the site that it came from. I know many republicans are in denial about the real corrruption in this country and they think that Republicans taking back the House will solve everything. It will not. They think that this particular site is a fringe site, but honestly, it is not. It is the only site were they deal with the real issues and everything is documented widely. There is no left/right paradigm, democrats and republicans are attacked regulary. The problem is much bigger than republicans think and till they don’t face reality, nothing will change in this country.
January 30th, 2010 at 3:11 am
I wonder how long Lardass Lamberth is going to sit on this case? Does Orly have some kind of legal options to force Lamberth to make a decision one way or another?
If he rules incorrectly, what legal options would Orly have to appeal?
January 30th, 2010 at 7:39 am
I personally hope this case goes all the way up to Judge Alito….wouldn’t that be sweet justice!!!
January 30th, 2010 at 8:02 am
The executive order that Obama “changed” on his first day was already in place.
His version was to remove the option of appeal.
See it here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords
The appeal to the President’s or vice President (past or current) may not be appealed was added. That means you get ONE shot to prove your case and demand records. After they give you what they want, you can ask for NOTHING else.
“h) A “final court order” is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.”
That was the change, and it is devastating.
January 30th, 2010 at 9:00 am
Robert DeBeaux #6
So if I understand you correctly, Orly Taitz gets only one chance at Quo Warranto, and if she loses, that’s it. No more chances?
January 30th, 2010 at 10:13 am
Tim says :
I personally hope this case goes all the way up to Judge Alito….wouldn’t that be sweet justice!!!
William says: I hope this case stops with Judge Lamberth
and Dr.Taitz gets a favorable ruling without the necessity of going before the Supreme court.The Supreme Court ,to my belief already know about Obama and refuses
to do anything at all.When a man,ANY man,can flaunt the Constitution and get away with it,my fears increase dramatically,because what other legal option is available to the American people ?
January 30th, 2010 at 10:43 am
Well said, William. I would have thought like you do that the Supreme Court would refuse further to do anything about BHO’s elligibility, but after the attack he made on them during the SOTU, I believe like Tim that Justice Alito, and possibly the rest of the Justices, will have a change of heart. I pray that happens. God Bless Dr. Orly Taitz, Our Lady Liberty!
January 30th, 2010 at 11:04 am
Well Regina,as I am sure you are well aware,Dr. Taitz flew
redeyes to hand deliver documentation to both Justice Roberts
and I believe Justice Scalia,and in both instances,Dr Taitz
was not only ignored but insulted by both of these men ? by “no comment”.So this bodes me to ask “Exactly what basis of trust can the American people expect for the Supreme Court ?”
I am just one small voice who doesn’t know “
January 30th, 2010 at 11:37 am
Sadly, a big part of Americans, lost their trust in our Government and especially in our Court system, including the SCOTUS. What is left for those of us? I’m afraid to even think about.
January 30th, 2010 at 11:47 am
Yes, William, I’m aware of all that Dr. Orly went thru with SCOTUS, but all I can do now is PRAY for a change of heart from these Justices. I’ve been following Dr. Orly for almost 2 years now and she will prevail! William, you are a patriot and a BIG voice in this fight.
January 30th, 2010 at 3:19 pm
It’s simple;
1. His father was a Kenyan (no question about this)
2. In 1961 Kenya was under British rule (this is a simple fact)
3. In 1961 all male British Subjects came under the British Nationality Act of 1948 (this states that all children born to British Subjects while overseas will be born British Subjects at birth. This is a British law dealing with British Subjects and can not be overridden by American law, being that his father was never an American Citizen & never applied for American Citizenship, nor wanted to be nationalized)
4. Article 2. Section 1. paragraph 5. of our Great Constitution has never been amended or changed in anyway and still requires the status of Natural Born American Citizen be required of any American President. (Natural born = born of BLOOD & SOIL – That is the BLOOD of both parents being American Citizens at the time of your birth and that birth on American SOIL. We know for a FACT that his father was NOT an American Citizen at the time of Barack Hussein Obams Jr.s birth thus no American Citizen BLOOD on his father’s side and we have never been provided with any prof that he was born on American SOIL, the Hawaiian COLB does not substantiate this fact. Alone the simple fact his father was never an American Citizen negates BHO’s ability to ever be considered a Natural Born American Citizen)
This is all the information any reasonable American needs to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the man sleeping in our White House is a Foreign Usurper and all those that were behind putting him there are Traitors, Un American, and are participating is a Communist coup to take over our Great Country by deceit and trickery.
Wake Up America – The TRUTH is right in front of your eyes!
January 31st, 2010 at 1:19 am
Yes the truth is right in front of our eyes,and why in God’s name are the republican party ignoring this issue, they should have stand up and fought like they have never fought before from the beginning. Is there a message here? I have written my congressman and every other congressman around the United States that I thought might have some GRIT,When and If this is uncovered God Help the ones that stood silent,It was your own damn fault
January 31st, 2010 at 2:25 am
Thank you Robert for that information! I didn’t read both versions (my bad), just saw the date and title and about lost my mind. Dear God, I can’t imagine what we will do if we can’t get him kicked out. I pray that that won’t be the case and that’s what gives me hope. If we have to suffer through 3 more years of this idiot, we probably won’t survive as a free republic.
January 31st, 2010 at 2:57 am
Tina Frost (#14),
The Republican Party is silent because it isn’t better than the Democrat Party. Both parties serve the same Masters and are controlled by them.
The right and left paradigm is an illusion. It is there only to keep you divided. While you fight with each other to get your party to win the election, your shadow government gets ahead on its agenda: lost of your freedom. It seems clear the left-right divide is serving the rulers. Anyway, Reps and Dems repeatedly get elected in an eternal merry-go-round that never solves the problem.
Why not join together and fight for your Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independance. Both parties trample your Constitution when they are in power but not necessarily on the same issues.
I believe joining forces is possible. Take capitalism for instance. One can oppose modern corporate capitalism from a socialist perspective, but also from a free market perspective, because corporations wielding government power destroy free markets. This is only an example… but I am sure there is many ways to join forces to defeat this rambling corruption that takes place in your government.
Any politician who is not willing to bring up the eligibility issue, doesn’t care about the Constitution and should not be elected. This is why I am not excited to see Republicans win these days, since they are all silent about this issue. What else will they be silent on? I don’t trust them and you shouldn’t either.
January 31st, 2010 at 3:02 am
P.S: Only elect candidates that swear they will bring up the eligibility issue… and forget about the other ones.