What does a ‘Red Herring’, long exposed to the elements, and a ‘Dead Fish’ have in common?

They both stink to high heaven. And neither one amounts to anything in the greater scheme of things.

What do a HI Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and Superman’s Krypton Birth Certificate have in common?

They both show that ‘someone’ was ‘born’, somewhere in the universe, but neither one ‘proves’ anything nor amounts to anything in the greater scheme of things.

The question remains then, how could all 535 (-1*) members of Congress, 9 members of the Supreme Court, 50 each State Governors, Attorneys General, and Secretaries of State – all obviously learned in the meaning of words, and all obviously sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution – how could they all buy into such unmitigated crap and deception that “Obama was born in Hawaii and is a Citizen (of WHATever), and therefore meets the Article II eligibility requirements of being a ‘Natural Born U.S. Citizen’?

* (Nancy Pelosi doesn’t count, since she has already been indicted by numerous Citizens’ Grand Juries for Election Fraud, for submitting a false and treasonous DNC certification to the Hawaiian Secretary of State so that Obama could be placed on the ballot, certifying that the Obama/Biden ticket was ‘legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the Constitution’. The 49+ other states, districts, and territories got differently worded certifications, without the ‘legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the Constitution’ phrase. Election fraud, pure and simple.

At least 60 million voting Americans are aware of the difference between ‘I believe he’s a citizen’ and ‘I believe he’s a Natural Born U.S. Citizen’ (we don’t count the main stream media folks who have major problem reporting the truth).

Which raises the obvious question: How is it that over 60 million Americans know the truth, while the sworn and elected officials of our Congress, Administration and Judiciary refuse to even question the ‘Natural Born’ crisis swirling around their heads?

You can’t say it’s all about the money or the power for all of them, especially since ‘breaking the story’ would bring so much honor, respect, money, and glory for the one(s) who are willing to do so. That leaves only one answer and conclusion:

Let it sink in. Brilliant (and some not so brilliant) and educated leaders in this, the greatest nation ever to exist on earth, always speaking about ours and their Constitutional Rights – and sworn to uphold them, can’t even say out loud or in writing the exact words of Article II of that Constitution: ‘No person except a natural born Citizen, … shall be eligible to the Office of President’. And it’s obviously not always about the power or the money. So I say again:

That offer could only be, ‘do you (and your family) want to go on living?’ If so, shut up about Article II - and all that goes with it, for the duration of the Obama administration – till death do us part!’

And so, since they have all chosen ‘life’, but all their arguments in favor of ignoring the truth defy any semblance of intelligence (even Mr. Constitution himself, Glenn Beck, makes unintelligible and ignorant statements and accusations against Article II Constitutionalists, while the normally outspoken Constitutionalist, Ron Paul, remains silent), the task of ousting the illegal and ineligible usurper from our White House now falls upon us, We The People.

And considering the ‘hostage-like’ statements and arguments of the aforementioned ‘offer-they-can’t-refuse’ recipients, then it becomes apparent that they are obviously pleading with us to do exactly what the Constitution tells us to do: exercise those rights and force the issue and truth out into the open, until most of those 60 million Americans become active and involved and empowered. Then, and only then, will the ‘hostages’ be freed, and then, and only then, will they be able to fearlessly step forward to honor their oaths.

For many it will be too late. Some will be destroyed by their treason, and some will be too demoralized to continue on. But for many others, they can step up to the plate to participate in the restoration of our Constitutional Republic – if we are willing to forgive them.

Until the usurper is ousted, all other issues pale into insignificance (amnesty, abortion, illegal immigration, 2nd Amendment rights, terrorists’ rights, etc, ad infinitum). So it’s up to us. We cannot wait until the elections of 2010 just to change the makeup of Congress, and we certainly can’t wait until 2012. We are at that tipping point, and it must be done – NOW!

Finally, since the CIVIL charges brought by numerous attorneys for over a year now can still be tied up indefinitely by Obama’s criminal Attorney General Eric Holder and the corrupt Judiciary, then the only viable peaceful course of action is with CRIMINAL charges (Election Fraud and Treason) served on courts and judges and sheriffs – in all 3,000 plus jurisdictions all across this Nation. And if you have a computer and/or access to the U.S. mail, you don’t even have to leave the comfort of your home to participate.

STOP what you’re doing – right now – and get about the business you know we must all do!

Neil Turner
Veteran, Captain – U.S. Army Aviation (1957-1964)
American Grand Jury Member

You can read the American Grand Jury Presentments here. You can download and print the package here. After you finished downloading the documents, sign them in front of a Notary, make a trip to your local Courthouse and serve them upon the Court. Take as many people with you as possible.

American Grand Jury is planning a Spring Tour to travel through 20-States to serve Presentments. Join us, follow us, help us. You will be serving your Country and family in true patriotic fashion. We MUST stop Obama. We must REMOVE him. He is a traitor to our Country. The man is a facist-communist and opposed to our American heritage and very way of life. Don’t wait until it is too late.. Like Neil says, “DO IT NOW!”

by Paul R. Hollrah, O.E.

Beyond surviving the current political madness in Washington, the American people have no greater task ahead than to insure themselves that another Barack Hussein Obama can never again hold political power in our country.

When the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia in September 1787 to sign the final draft of the U.S. Constitution, the physical scars of the War of Independence from Great Britain were still visible all around them and a deep-seated animosity toward all things British colored every aspect of their daily lives. So is it even remotely conceivable that just five years and eleven months after the British surrendered at Yorktown, the Founders would have presented to the states for ratification a Constitution that would allow an individual with divided loyalties – e.g., an individual with dual US-British citizenship – to serve as president or vice president of the United States? It is not, and they did not.

In order to forestall that eventuality the Framers included a provision…Article II, Section 4…requiring that candidates for president and vice president be at least thirty five years of age, that they have been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years, and that they be natural born U.S. citizens, owing allegiance to no foreign power because of the circumstances of birth.

Expressing the prevailing concerns of the time, Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers,

“These most deadly adversaries of republican government (cabal, intrigue, etc.) might actually have expected to make their approach from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”

In recent columns we have discussed the controlling legal authority, under U.S., British, and Kenyan law, necessary to determine Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

If we can agree that Obama’s father, a citizen of Kenya, then a British colony, was a British subject at the time of his birth, a fact that Obama himself has attested to on numerous occasions, it is evident that, under Part 2, Section 5[1] of the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama was born with automatic British citizenship “by decent” from his father. Thus, it is an inescapable fact that Obama held dual US-British citizenship from the date of his birth, August 4, 1961, until December 12, 1963, the day that Kenya won its independence from Great Britain.

However, Article VI, Section 87[3](2) of the Kenyan Constitution states that “Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (Obama Jr.), or a British protected person, shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.”

Therefore, setting aside the possibility that Obama may have acquired Indonesian citizenship when his mother married Indonesian Lolo Soetoro and moved to Jakarta in 1967, it is clear that Obama held dual US-Kenyan citizenship from December 12, 1963, the date of Kenyan independence, until at least his 21st birthday on August 4, 1982, when he claims to have been a student at Columbia University in New York.

In either event, Barack Obama is clearly not a “natural born” U.S. citizens and is, therefore, ineligible to serve in the office he occupies. So how did we manage to get ourselves into this mess? Three successive systemic failures combined to provide us with a usurper president.

The first failure occurred in Denver, Colorado during the last week of August 2008 when Democrats met to nominate candidates for president and vice president. The delegates to that convention had an obligation to put before the American people fully qualified candidates for our nation’s two highest offices. They did not live up to that responsibility. Instead, they certified to the states a candidate for president who was, and is, ineligible to serve in that office.

The second failure occurred on December 15, 2008 when the Electoral College met to elect a president and vice president. In Federalist Paper No. 68, Alexander Hamilton referred to the “investigation” necessary to the selection of a president and vice president. In describing the duties of the Electoral College, he said, “A small number of persons, selected by their fellow citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to so complicated an investigation.”

Although the Democratic members of the 2008 Electoral College were forewarned that Obama may not possess the necessary qualifications, they were apparently so anxious to regain control of the White House that they simply ignored their constitutional obligation to select a candidate who was fully qualified to serve.

The third and final failure occurred on January 8, 2009 when the Congress met in joint session to certify the vote of the Electoral College. As the final and failsafe step in the electoral process, the Congress had the duty to insure themselves of the qualifications of Barack Obama and Joe Biden…which they failed to do.

So where does this leave us? Obama Kool-Ade drinkers, and Democrats in general, are blithely dismissive. Their view is that the people have spoken; they went to the polls and voted, so that’s it…leave it alone. Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution be damned. But that cannot be the case.

In a December 8, 2008 discussion of the congressional certification process, Dr. Edwin Viera, Jr., Ph.D., J.D., a leading authority on the Constitution, argues that, “…the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient.

“Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be ‘a natural born Citizen,’ by simply assuming that he is such, or by accepting something other than what lawyers call ‘the best evidence.’ ” (e.g. Obama’s published certificate of live birth, versus a certified Hawaiian birth certificate)

Dr. Viera argues that, if no objection is made on the basis that Obama is not a natural born citizen (in which case an Elector cannot constitutionally vote for him)…the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a “constitutional sufficiency (emphasis added),” because Congress has no power to simply waive the Constitution’s eligibility requirement…

This leaves us with the question, if the Congress acts irresponsibly, indifferently, or not at all, is the issue foreclosed forever? Not at all. Instead, Dr. Viera suggests that the time will come when the Justice Department will attempt to enforce, through criminal prosecutions, some of the controversial legislation that the new Congress will enact and Obama will sign into law. Then, “as a matter of undeniable constitutional right and practical necessity,” a class of litigants with absolute standing will come into existence.

With Obama occupying the Oval Office, that day has already arrived. We need only to await the courageous individual(s) who will stand on principle, demanding that the laws they are required to obey were signed into law by a president eligible to do so…that they are, in fact, the law of the land.

Above all, the American people must understand what it means to simply ignore Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution…for no better reason than that it would be incredibly messy to remove Obama at this late date. For one to take that position, one must then also be willing to cavalierly set aside other provisions of the Constitution, such as the 1st Amendment rights to religious freedom, free speech, a free press, and the freedom of assembly; the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms; the 4th Amendment protections against illegal search and seizure; the 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination; and the 7th Amendment right to trial by jury.

Are we to question citizenship rights for African Americans under the 14th Amendment, black voting rights under the 15th Amendment, women’s voting rights under the 19th Amendment, or the eighteen-year-old vote under the 26th Amendment? And how about presidential election voting rights for District of Columbia residents, guaranteed under the 23rd Amendment?

It is safe to assume that, among these latter groups…blacks, women, 18-20 year-olds, and DC residents…there are a substantial number of Obama voters. Are they truly serious about simply ignoring Article II, Section 4, while demanding that we hold fast to everything else in the Constitution? Would they have their cake and eat it too?

The United States Constitution means exactly what it says…nothing more, nothing less…and if we expect to reap the benefits of its many rights and freedoms we cannot allow the document to be selectively enforced. Stay tuned, America.

source: http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/p_hollrah/2010/03022010.htm

By Bruce Walker

America’s elites have become obsessed with the perks of power. They will be replaced by a new governance of ordinary Americans seeking to preserve the blessings of liberty bequeathed by our founders. What Herbert E. Meyer wrote last week about how our nation is undergoing a quiet, peaceful removal of a ruling class from power, I believe will happen. Here is why.

Our Revolutionary War was not won by a well-drilled, paid, professional army. We won independence through the courage and sacrifice of citizen soldiers. If there is a theme to the Tea Party Movement, it is this spirit of voluntary and unselfish commitment to the triumph of liberty. As so many of us know, the brave men who signed the Declaration of Independence risked everything by their signature on that document. They, personally, risked much and sought no gain but the ideals of the Declaration.

The left does not grasp unselfish sacrifice. The Founding Fathers, to the students of moral nihilism produced by our colleges today, must have had a mercenary interest in our independence. What about those soldiers with bleeding feet who stayed with Washington at Valley Forge? They must have been dupes, however poignantly their own letters reveal otherwise. It is not just the left which cannot grasp fighting for higher ideals, it has become a whole, encrusted system of privilege and power which finds sacrifice “stupid.”

Yet these are the few, the insulated, the snug members of the hives of power. This means Washington, of course, but it also means academia and Hollywood and all the other safe havens for the toadies of those who would take our freedom in exchange for entitlement IOUs that our children will pay. It is simply dumbfounding how often these elites are wrong, and how seldom it seems to bother them. There is no consequence, of course, for their failure.

Whatever the devotionals of their secular faith in blind power, these perennial insiders are almost always wrong. Global warming is a grand, malicious fraud? So what! The Cold War that could not be won was won? Big deal! Those of us who try to look inside thee minds of these people for sparks of thought and belief, even in the form of a misguided ideology, are looking for something that isn’t there: power and conformity to those who have power is the ideology and the holy faith of those who scurry self-importantly about.

Who faces them in battle? Americans who are citizen soldiers and all volunteers: We, not they, hold the lamp of liberty in our arms. We do not wait for orders — indeed, we do not take orders. Hillary once complained of a “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy,” but this was surely projection on her part. The regimented, unthinking mercenaries in our political wars are drones of the left, not the right.

This is why we will win. The roots of ordered freedom run deep in our nation. Those roots have been nourished with the blood of young men who died in lonely places like Anzio and Khe Sanh. Generations have grown up learning less from drearily politicized history books than from the examples of their parents, neighbors, and parishioners living lives which bespoke confidence, hope, and self-reliance.

The citizen soldiers who wait to escort out the political bosses who have squeezed our country for their benefit operate without orders. The Tea Party Movement is entirely self-generating. A precursor in 1993 was “Dan’s Bake Sale,” begun as a lark when Rush Limbaugh suggested a bake sale to allow a caller to raise money to subscribe to the Limbaugh Letter. Thousands came, had fun, behaved well, and left: No federal regulations, no college syllabus, nothing but free people exercising their freedom.

How, exactly, do the automatons of the establishment deal with these citizen soldiers? The Redcoats faced the same problem in the Revolutionary War, when the harshly drilled tin soldiers of Europe encountered Americans who would hide behind trees (rather than blast in a close barrage) and who fired long range rifles rather than close order muskets.

These citizen cadres of conservatism who will reclaim our land do not take orders from above. We operate individually, like tens of millions of independent, autonomous minds, guided only by broad principles and objectives, and seeking less to capture any citadel or city than to liberate them all. Free men tend to take freedom for granted. It is almost in the nature of that treasure. But when free men fight, slave armies lose. That war is being fought, and won, right now.

Micheal E. Hammond, former General Counsel of the U.S. Senate Steering Committee, is one of the preeminent experts on U.S. Senate procedure. Here is what he says about passing ObamaCare via reconciliation.

February 22, 2010, 10:00 a.m. EST
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Michael Hammond
RE: New Obama Health Care Draft

As of this hour, there is an 11-page document on the White House web site outlining Obama’s newest version of ObamaCare. Before laying out a summary of the most recent Obama proposal, I would like to make a couple preliminary points:

PRELIMINARY POINT #1: OBAMACARE CANNOT BE PASSED
THROUGH RECONCILIATION

There are several reasons for this:

First, you cannot get the bill through the House
without “fixing” abortion, and you cannot do
abortion on reconciliation in the Senate.

Cao will not be the deciding vote. This means that,
if absolutely nothing has changed, the current House
vote count on the House bill is 217-216. But things
have changed:

-Public support for ObamaCare has continued to
sink through the floor.

-Between 10 and 12 “yes” votes would vote against
the Senate bill based on its abortion language.

-Many House Democrats are still uncomfortable
about the “Cadillac tax.”

But, under the Byrd Rule (which prohibits
reconciliation language with budgetary implications
which are only ancillary to the policy
ramifications), you can’t fix abortion on
reconciliation. We have asked Senate parliamentarian
Alan Frumin concerning our ability to offer abortion
amendments to reconciliation, and he has adamantly
stood by the position that this is not allowed. And,
to get around the Byrd Rule, the Senate requires 60
votes. Without an abortion “fix,” this bill cannot
pass the House.

Furthermore, the new provision to allow the
government to set insurance rates is also a violation
of the Byrd Rule.

Also, the $60 billion union “fix” requires a $62
billion offset. And the additional substantial costs
of Obama’s proposal would also have to be offset.
Assuming they take the entire $2.5 trillion package
and pass the whole thing through reconciliation, they
can pay for some of these costs with the phony $124
billion budget “surplus” contained in the Senate-
passed bill. The downside of this is that the
insurance “reforms” (preexisting conditions, limits
on copayments, etc.) which form the core of the bill
will be thrown out under the Byrd Rule.

But, assuming they are using reconciliation for
nothing more than a “fix,” they have to come up with
a new set of offsets. The offsets on the Senate bill
are unavailable to them. And it’s not like it has
been easy to come up with the offsets they have.

In order to comply with the 1974 Act, these offsets
would have to make the reconciliation bill compliant
with the reconciliation instructions during the first
five-year window and revenue-neutral in every year
thereafter. Thus far, NO VERSION OF THE LEGISLATION
HAS BEEN ABLE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, EVEN
USING THE PHONY ACCOUNTING GIMMICKS.

Incidentally, Pelosi is now demanding that the Senate
act on reconciliation before House members are forced
to put their necks on the line again. But a Senate-
initiated tax bill is unconstitutional, and would be
“blue slipped” in the House.

Incidentally, the 1974 Act allows an unlimited number of amendments to be offered, without debate, at the end of the 20-hour statutory time for debate. My recommendation would be that, if Senate Democrats decide to invoke the “nuclear option” and throw out the Senate rules in order to do reconciliation, that the first ten amendments be the pro-gun agenda.

Finally, the Senate has failed to comply with the reconciliation instructions that mandated reporting by October 15. And, although they may get a pass on this, the production of a new concurrent budget resolution will extinguish this possibility unequivocally.

PRELIMIARY POINT #2:

What bothered the American people, as much as anything, was the perception that the Senate’s ObamaCare bill was produced by fraud, secrecy, corruption, bribery, and extortion. Rather than improve the process, the White House has actually made it more corrupt by –-

-threatening to fraudulently take a process
restricted SOLELY to deficit reduction and using
it to pass the biggest deficit engine in human
history; and

-refusing to release legislative language, in the
hope that controversies can be kept secret.

there is more to the story here…REDSTATE website

By James Lewis

Obama is now coming out with two contradictory messages.

Either:

• (a) He is set to drive Medi-Grab through Congress, regardless of American popular opposition, or
• (b) He is ready to junk it.

Sometimes the Administration leaks one story, sometimes the opposite. In fact, Obama may not even know which of his two contradictory messages he believes. He may be sending up two different trial balloons, waiting to see who screams louder, the radical Left or the voters.

If he goes for option (a) he rallies the radical Left and loses the country; if he takes the Charge of the Light Brigade route (b), he’ll keep the country and lose the radical Left. Obama is steering his ship right between two rocky promontories, like Odysseus trying to navigate between the dangerous rocks of Scylla and Charybdis. But then Odysseus was a smart navigator.

According to Fox News, the most mentally fixated president in American history is going for an all-out Medi-Grab, regardless of the results for the country or the Democratic Party. Obama’s Medi-Grab is the biggest wedge the Democrats can drive into the body politic, intended to turn the US forever into a socialist zombie state where the Left is in control, just like Europe.

Medi-Grab couldn’t pass the Senate when the Democrats were playing by the rules. But now Harry Reid, the electorally doomed Majority Leader, is said to be signaling his willingness to commit hara-kiri for Obama. If Reid can push through the “public option,” a 51 vote majority in the Senate will let the Democrats drive private insurance out of business with tax-subsidized Medicare for 330 million people, including illegals — even if it breaks the budget for decades to come.

This is Obama’s Audacity of Desperation.

Obama’s Medi-Grab will break the Medicare system, because you can’t cover 330 million people, including illegals, just with the tax money currently dedicated to the elderly. Something’s got to give, and it will be Medicare for the elderly. But the elderly are the most medically endangered sector of the population. Does anybody see Death Panels in the offing?

Well, Robert Reich and Rahmbro Ezekiel Emmanuel have called for exactly that. They have told us the elderly are not worth the money to keep them alive. The US equivalent of Britain’s NICE panel (which decrees which critical care treatments will be paid by the National Health Service) is already in the US law. It was sneaked by as part of the “stimulus package” last year.

Electorally the Democrats are bleeding and panicked. They know they’re going to see the crash of a lot of political careers. But it seems that the hard Left, led by the Chicago clique in the White House, is willing to steer the ship of state on the rocks, on the wild gamble that Americans will see how glorious the results will be — very much against the openly expressed will of the people. They think they can pick up the pieces after 2010.

Well, it won’t work. We can’t allow it to work, because it will zombify the country. It’s Obama the Vampire time. Europe is already zombified, as you can see by their inability to use common sense. The voters have been intimidated and bought off. They can no longer act in their own self-interest, and they are being sucked into the European Union against popular opposition. That’s the model.

Obama’s desperation pass makes 2010 the most crucial election year ever, more important than the 1980 election that pitted Ronald Reagan against Jimmy Carter. If the Fox News report is true, this is a suicide charge by the Left. They will try to drive in that solid wedge before voters get a chance to act, and let the consequences be damned.

It is therefore crucial to convince the Democrats that they will never be forgiven — by the Medicare population, for one — for driving a wedge through the heart of this country. The Left is counting on the fact that most Americans don’t pay attention to politics. But no sensible American can doubt that this is the most power-hungry, radical Leftist administration in history. They are waking up — slowly.

Obama’s Medi-Grab must be stopped immediately, by a public uproar of unprecedented size and intensity. We know who they are, we know what they want, and we, the people, want to stop them. It’s time for a Megaton Tea Party.

Now we know why Evan Bayh is resigning. He doesn’t want to fall on his sword for the greater glory of Obama. He’s letting the hard Left go for broke, and when things fall apart he can come back and pick up the pieces. Maybe.

But that doesn’t save the country from the mind-locked Fraudocrats who are now in power, determined to impose a Leftist Revolution from Above. The “Revolution from Above” is a Stalinist concept. It means permanent power for the control freaks. That is what the US Constitution was designed to block.

But the Constitution can sink without voters who are alert to the danger from the radicals who control the White House and Congress today.

So it’s up to you. The bad guys are running the town. It’s time for the US Cavalry to ride to the rescue.

That means you.